Today
marks the last lesson of TWC and is also the second class dedicated to presentations.
There were a total of 5 presentations and they covered a broad spectrum of
topics – prosthesis, trans-humanism, sex advertising, food of the future and virtual
reality.
The
first presentation was on prosthesis, with a particular focus on
mind-controlled bionic limbs and state-of-the-art prosthesis that are used by
disabled athletes to enable them to realize their athletic potential and
compete with able-bodied athletes at the most elite levels. Two issues were raised
by the group which I found particularly troubling/interesting. The first – that
bionic limbs which do not leave finger imprints may be used by the ill-willed
to commit serious crimes such as murders. This is a profound and chilling
scenario to contemplate and is a apposite example of how technology may be a
double-edged sword. Although the benefits of such bionic limbs are undoubtedly
extensive and would transform the lives of the disabled, such innovations are
also liable to misuse which could result in devastating consequences. The
second – the group was of the view that disabled athletes who are fitted with
advanced prosthesis are given an unfair competitive advantage over their
able-bodied counterparts and should not be allowed to participate in the same
events as the latter group. The group cited the example of Oscar Pistorius, who
was the first double amputee to compete at the Olympics in 2012. However, what
the group failed to mention was that Oscar Pistorius had not, as one might
expect in the group taking issue with the unfair advantage afforded by athletic
prosthesis, won the event in which he participated in – the 400m race.
Pistorius had come in last in the semi-finals and was booted out of the
competition. Hence, I do not think it accurate to say that disabled athletes
equipped with modern prosthesis which enable them to compete in the same events
as their able-bodied counterparts necessarily have a disproportionate advantage
over athletes relying on their natural limbs. Disproportionate advantage should
not be the basis on which disabled athletes and able-bodied athletes are
completely segregated in events – many disabled athletes dream of competing on
the same level as able-bodied athletes and the fact is that there are a lot
more platforms and opportunities for competition for able-bodied athletes than
there are specially created events for Paralympics. This issue of advantage and
the actual extent that bionic limbs enhance the performance of disabled
athletes should be further investigated before any conclusive assertion should
be made on it and policy implemented in proceeding on such assertions.
The
second group presented on trans-humanism, and some of the material covered
overlapped with the first group. Essentially, the group explored the different
types of assistive technologies which complement and enhance the performance of
daily activities of living of the user – from bionic eyes which help the blind
to regain sight, to brain pacemakers which purportedly could overcome severe
brain damage in patients by awakening them using deep brain electrical stimulation.
All these technologies seem to hold great promise and are indeed intriguing. If
these technologies were to be made widely available and accessible, disability would
become a term of the past.
The
third group presented on the topic of sex advertising – how it came about, how
it has evolved and how it will develop in future, with the advent of new
technologies and introduction of novel platforms on which advertisements may be
taken out. I felt the website created by the group to be rather blatant and
explicit, although the illustrations did thoroughly drive home the points that
the group sought to make – that women were being excessively objectified in
some forms of advertising and how excessively photoshopped advertisements have
impacted how women and men perceive themselves and the ideal body types of both
gender. I felt that the points raised by the group were especially pertinent in
this day and age which witnesses increasing consumption of media and
advertisements that proliferate all around us. Young children and
impressionable youths are increasingly drawing their beliefs and perceptions of
the world from the images and ideas portrayed by the media. The consequences of
this unfolding phenomenon are especially worrying and concrete and urgent
measures should be taken to address them to alleviate the harmful effects of
these consequences. One example as noted by the group, was how certain
advertisements by established clothing retailers which portrayed violence
against women and represented women as deriving pleasure from such violence,
were banned in some countries. I felt that this was a very crucial and sensible
move by the government. In a time when rape is deemed to be a severe criminal
offence in numerous countries, violence against women cannot be tolerated, and
advertisements which, whether intentionally or otherwise, normalised such acts
of violence must not be allowed to register seemingly matter-of-factly in
societal consciousness.
The
fourth group presented essentially on the issue of food security and how it
could be enhanced, especially in countries currently experiencing acute
poverty. The group identified that the main problem was not a quantified lack
of food, but rather, a failure of proportionate distribution of the total amount
of food produced. I completely agree with the group’s proposition and findings.
It is inconceivable to me how there can be so much wastage in developed
countries – expansive quantities of unsold bread thrown away at the end of each
day by bakeries; uneaten food at buffets simply discarded and fresh batches
prepared for the next buffet timings – when there are people who can barely
scrap together one decent meal a day in the poorest countries and there are
millions dying of starvation and malnutrition in the world. The technology and
processes which the group explored as possible promising solutions to resolve
the issue of world hunger spanned a broad spectrum, from harnessing
biotechnology in the production of GM food and in-vitro meat to the use of improved
agricultural technologies and processes to enhance quantity and quality of
yield. I also really enjoyed the interactive and innovative mode of
presentation employed by the group – the group started off their presentation
with a short skit illustrating the subject matter of their presentation – that of
the differing circumstances faced by farmers labouring in rural regions and “farmers”
in developed countries.
The last
presentation was on virtual reality and the group also started off their
presentation with an innovative demonstration of how virtual reality may be
employed in real life. The group presented on 4 fields in which virtual reality
is currently employed – that of medical, transport, military and in the virtual
world. Indeed, the value and potential of this technology is extensive and mankind
is only limited by his imagination. Just consider the utility and benefit of
such virtual simulation in the field of transport and surgery – novices/amateurs
(e.g. fighter jet pilots and surgeons) are allowed to hone their skills to a
level of competence in a harmless and safe environment before they can be
deemed certified to operate in actual, potentially high-risk situations. This
greatly reduces the likelihood of casualty rates and moderates the steepness of
learning curves, enabling improved quality of professional skill sets.
I would
rate this lesson a 10/10 for being the most enjoyable and light-hearted TWC lesson
of the semester. All the groups had put in much thought and effort into their
presentations and incorporated really amusing antics and attempts at
interacting with the class throughout their deliveries. I also learned a lot from
the extensive range of topics covered.
No comments:
Post a Comment